Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Forum

AI Industry Working Group

Private

Posts


  • Guideline terminology: Canadian, US/North American, International
    Jennifer CarrollJ Jennifer Carroll

    Hey @HollyMed

    Yes, per the copy "In the scenario described above where guidelines lower in the aforementioned hierarchy are being used over the available US guidelines, evidence must be provided to support that these guidelines are a true reflection of Canadian practice". Note that there may be instances where we ask for more information about US guidelines. This is extremely rare and the rationale is disclosed during the review process. If you find yourself in this rare instance, please reach out to the reviewer for clarification.

    Claims & Support/References for Claims

  • Guideline terminology: Canadian, US/North American, International
    Jennifer CarrollJ Jennifer Carroll

    Hey @HollyMed

    Please see Q&A 593.

    Claims & Support/References for Claims

  • Middle level fair balance linking to high-level fair balance
    Jennifer CarrollJ Jennifer Carroll

    @Jennifer_CM
    Example 3 appears to be about the product monograph web link destination. The original question above is about linking middle level fair balance to highest level fair balance. Linking middle level fair balance to highest requires that it’s within the same tool or directly attached. A print journal ad is not the same medium as a URL link (web based) and therefore would not be acceptable.

    Claims & Support/References for Claims

  • 577 - Hi - I understand that as per Section 6.6iv, an email informing HCPs about 'updated provincial formulary criteria for Drug X' would be considered PAAB exempt (if there were no linkage to therapeutic or promotional claims). Could you provide clarification on whether including a website link to the full formulary list of a province would still be considered exempt? Note that this formulary list contains criteria specific to Drug X.
    Jennifer CarrollJ Jennifer Carroll

    Hey @ALee
    “Indirect link to a general formulary/Provincial homepage” is the same as “full formulary list of a province”. As per the response above, this would not be considered exempt.

    Linkage Issues

  • Guidance on Patient Reported Outcomes
    Jennifer CarrollJ Jennifer Carroll

    Hi tk2022

    Please see our more recent “Guidance on Real World Evidence/Data” for criteria and direction on the presentation of RWE in advertising to health care professionals. Please also see our "Guidance on the use of the Attention Icon" regarding unblinded data.

    Guidance on Code Application

  • Consensus Guidelines
    Jennifer CarrollJ Jennifer Carroll

    Hi @megancouture

    Claims based on acceptable, authoritative consensus guidelines do not need to be verbatim from the reference. However, it must capture the recommendation accurately and within context. It must not impart a new or different meaning than the guidelines.

    PAAB Code

Member List

Jennifer CarrollJ Jennifer Carroll
Patrick MassadP Patrick Massad
S samra.rehman
J Jen C
C ColetteMH
M micheleparent
M MariaD
F Farinam
B bryanroman
B BMarinac
J Jon
J jliang
J jgchiriboga
C camillekiffer
M melissaferlaino
C costeap
D Daniellea
T Tommy-Lam
NatBourreN NatBourre
S simonsmith
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups