Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Forum

Manufacturer

Private

Posts


  • Presenting AE rates using a higher incidence threshold than what is used in the PM
    Jennifer CarrollJ Jennifer Carroll

    Hello @dmauri

    PAAB will generally consider alternate cut offs from the TMA if it does not appear to be minimizing the risks of the product. The alternate cut-offs should not remove pertinent ADRs/safety information that would otherwise be important to the product and within the therapeutic landscape. The TMA should also not have other safety considerations that would preclude the higher percentage cutoff.

    Claims & Support/References for Claims

  • Fair Balance required for email linking to clincial paper
    Jennifer CarrollJ Jennifer Carroll

    Good Morning @Jennifer_CM

    Linking out to an unedited acceptable reprint would not render the email subject to highest level fair balance. The level of fair balance would be assessed based on the content of the email body in combination with the linked content. Therefore, it’s likely that the level of fair balance could be lowest level if the body copy does not prompt middle or highest itself as per the PAAB Guidance on Base Fair Balance Level Selection and Placement (HCP Advertising).

    PAAB Code

  • Clarification on Product Available now! message in the APS
    S Supriya

    Thank you @Jennifer-Carroll!

    General Discussion

  • Clarification on Product Available now! message in the APS
    Jennifer CarrollJ Jennifer Carroll

    Hey @Supriya

    This appears to be a specific question about a specific piece. Copy around “new product availability” is broadly open to interpretation. PAAB would also need to see the third-party program site to assess the combination of all messaging within the piece and the linked content. We suggest submitting for an opinion.

    General Discussion

  • Promotional activities on-line
    P Pauvian

    Jennifer, thank you very much for your prompt answer. We will do that.

    PAAB Code

  • Clarification on indication inclusion in multi-Product APS
    S Supriya

    Thank you @Jennifer-Carroll. This is very helpful!

    General Discussion

Member List

Patrick MassadP Patrick Massad
Jennifer CarrollJ Jennifer Carroll
D devadmin
L litmanenPL
M Mantra
C ColetteMH
R roland.ligetvari
M micheleparent
C Cknezevic
T tbalzarini
N Neda
X xjga
K kquinn
C csimsipsen
N Natalie B
D danielceleste
C cuq
S shumja
S Supriya
K kjennin6
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups