Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Forum

  1. Home
  2. PAAB Q&A
  3. Claims & Support/References for Claims
  4. Questions regarding 'prognosis'-type claims
The responses, guidance, and advisories provided by the Pharmaceutical Advertising Advisory Board (PAAB), including but not limited to those available through the PAAB Forum, the PAAB website, and any PAAB correspondences, are specifically intended to assist individuals navigating the PAAB preclearance system. Repurposing or reproducing this content without written consent from the PAAB Commissioner is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, use in machine learning or AI models.

Questions regarding 'prognosis'-type claims

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Claims & Support/References for Claims
1 Posts 1 Posters 5 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    kshulist
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Hi there,
    Could you please provide me with some clarity around "prognosis"-type claims in a branded APS. For example, claims like, "People with diseaseA associated with mutationB have a worse prognosis" or "The five-year survival rate of disease A is 40%". (In the first example, the drug would be indicated for patients with diseaseA associated with mutationB).

    My questions are:

    1. Can you use these types of claims in a branded sense as long as they are clearly portrayed as "disease information"? And follow-up: would it depend on whether the product has OS data or not?

    2. These feel like they might fall under the burden of disease guidelines, is that correct (I'm thinking it could be "sequelae")? The BoD guidance says that sequelae for which the product has no data should not be emphasized - does that mean we can still mention them in an unemphasized manner?

    3. If you can use them in a branded sense, what kind of reference support do you need for them? If (2) is correct, would the references be the same as for burdens in section 3 of the BoD guidance?

    Thank you so much for your help!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups