The responses, guidance, and advisories provided by the Pharmaceutical Advertising Advisory Board (PAAB),
including but not limited to those available through the PAAB Forum, the PAAB website, and any PAAB
correspondences, are specifically intended to assist individuals navigating the PAAB preclearance system.
Repurposing or reproducing this content without written consent from the PAAB Commissioner is strictly
prohibited. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, use in machine learning or AI models.
206 - Under what circumstances would it be acceptable to claim that two arms of a clinical trial have similar side effect profiles? Does it only relate to the type of most commonly reported adverse drug reactions in each arm or must the incidence also be comparable?
Claims & Support/References for Claims
1
Posts
1
Posters
424
Views
1
Watching
-
Broad comparative claims relating to side effect profile are only considered when they appear explicitly in the Product Monograph. When based on a study, a safety comparison would be subject to all PAAB code requirements (including limitation to specific adverse events defined a priori with corresponding statistical analysis).
