Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Forum

  1. Home
  2. PAAB Q&A
  3. Claims & Support/References for Claims
  4. 288 - If we are to conduct comparative analysis (our product vs. marketed products from the same category) to support a claim to be presented to HCP, what are the standards that the study and resutls should meet for PAAB to consider it acceptable?
PAAB Notice
The responses, guidance, and advisories provided by the Pharmaceutical Advertising Advisory Board (PAAB), including but not limited to those available through the PAAB Forum, the PAAB website, and any PAAB correspondences, are specifically intended to assist individuals navigating the PAAB preclearance system. Repurposing or reproducing this content without written consent from the PAAB Commissioner is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, use in machine learning or AI models.

288 - If we are to conduct comparative analysis (our product vs. marketed products from the same category) to support a claim to be presented to HCP, what are the standards that the study and resutls should meet for PAAB to consider it acceptable?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Claims & Support/References for Claims
1 Posts 1 Posters 244 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
    Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
    Jennifer Carroll
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I need a bit more info to provide an answer. Please clarify the following two parameters: the nature of the comparisoni.e. therapeutic comparison relating to efficacy/safety, pharmacoeconomic comparison, retention, format availability, other non-clinical features (e.g. receptor affinity/potency, MOA, preference, cosmetic/sensory attributes), etcÂ…the nature of the sourcei.e. a survey, a published clinical trial, product monographs, third party data, etcÂ…

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups