Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Forum

  1. Home
  2. PAAB Code
  3. PAAB Code 3.2.3
PAAB Notice
The responses, guidance, and advisories provided by the Pharmaceutical Advertising Advisory Board (PAAB), including but not limited to those available through the PAAB Forum, the PAAB website, and any PAAB correspondences, are specifically intended to assist individuals navigating the PAAB preclearance system. Repurposing or reproducing this content without written consent from the PAAB Commissioner is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, use in machine learning or AI models.

PAAB Code 3.2.3

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved PAAB Code
4 Posts 3 Posters 690 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    georgian21
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Reference to research or ongoing studies may be made in a non- promotional context with no prominence on information that has not been authorized by Health Canada. A study involving off-label use, which has been completed, has undergone an interim analysis, or has been presented at a medical meeting, and incorporates information that is not included in the Health Canada TMA, must not be mentioned in advertising.

    In the Oncology space, one drug can, overtime, get studied in other completely different diseases (or tumour sites). If a TMA exists for disease A and is currently being studied in disease Z (completely unrelated), are the studies considered off-label or pre-NOC (not yet authorized by Health Canada)? I feel it is the latter given that it is a distinct disease (and indication) but wanted to double check

    Jennifer CarrollJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G georgian21

      Reference to research or ongoing studies may be made in a non- promotional context with no prominence on information that has not been authorized by Health Canada. A study involving off-label use, which has been completed, has undergone an interim analysis, or has been presented at a medical meeting, and incorporates information that is not included in the Health Canada TMA, must not be mentioned in advertising.

      In the Oncology space, one drug can, overtime, get studied in other completely different diseases (or tumour sites). If a TMA exists for disease A and is currently being studied in disease Z (completely unrelated), are the studies considered off-label or pre-NOC (not yet authorized by Health Canada)? I feel it is the latter given that it is a distinct disease (and indication) but wanted to double check

      Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
      Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
      Jennifer Carroll
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Hey @georgian21
      The study is off-label as the product does not have NOC for the disease being investigated.

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Jennifer CarrollJ Jennifer Carroll

        Hey @georgian21
        The study is off-label as the product does not have NOC for the disease being investigated.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lags
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @jennifer-carroll
        Thanks Jennifer. Given that the product is not yet authorized for the indication being studied(pre-NOC) AND the studies are still ongoing, could we not create an APS that refers to these ongoing studies? Eg. Objective, Design, number of patients etc. The code seems to state this.

        Jennifer CarrollJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lags

          @jennifer-carroll
          Thanks Jennifer. Given that the product is not yet authorized for the indication being studied(pre-NOC) AND the studies are still ongoing, could we not create an APS that refers to these ongoing studies? Eg. Objective, Design, number of patients etc. The code seems to state this.

          Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
          Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
          Jennifer Carroll
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Hello @Lags

          The question above was interpreted as requesting clarification of the regulatory classification of the studies. While it did not specifically state that disease Z study was “ongoing” (the definition of this is critical – see below) , there are scenarios where an ongoing off-label study may be presented in APS, as well as scenarios where it must not be mentioned in APS. For further details of the discussion of ongoing studies, please see Code section 3.2.3 as well as Q&A 223 & Q&A 537

          If the studies no longer qualify as ongoing (no longer in the data gather phase, or an interim analysis has been performed, data has been presented, etc.), the study cannot be discussed as it is considered off-label. There should be no pre-NOC advertising or off-label advertising. The crux of 3.2.3 is that it is non-promotional and intended only to outline the research the company is involved in.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups