Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Forum

  1. Home
  2. PAAB Q&A
  3. Claims & Support/References for Claims
  4. 404 - Hi Patrick, I am doing a slide kit for the reps based on our PM. In the PM it mentions a study with our drug against a non-approved drug, so I can use this info in my slide. New studies have come out on our drug vs the non-approved drug would I be able to use this new data in my slide deck for the reps.
PAAB Notice
The responses, guidance, and advisories provided by the Pharmaceutical Advertising Advisory Board (PAAB), including but not limited to those available through the PAAB Forum, the PAAB website, and any PAAB correspondences, are specifically intended to assist individuals navigating the PAAB preclearance system. Repurposing or reproducing this content without written consent from the PAAB Commissioner is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, use in machine learning or AI models.

404 - Hi Patrick, I am doing a slide kit for the reps based on our PM. In the PM it mentions a study with our drug against a non-approved drug, so I can use this info in my slide. New studies have come out on our drug vs the non-approved drug would I be able to use this new data in my slide deck for the reps.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Claims & Support/References for Claims
1 Posts 1 Posters 212 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
    Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
    Jennifer Carroll
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi there. Use the following thought process to work through this scenario “The only reason the data is acceptable in spite of PAAB code 5.1 is that it appears in the PM”. As a deductive extension of this, other data from the same published study which is not found in the PM is not acceptable. As an additional extension, other similar data (e.g. from other studies) which is not in the PM are not acceptable.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups