Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Forum

  1. Home
  2. PAAB Q&A
  3. Miscellaneous
  4. Emailing Guidelines to HCPs
The responses, guidance, and advisories provided by the Pharmaceutical Advertising Advisory Board (PAAB), including but not limited to those available through the PAAB Forum, the PAAB website, and any PAAB correspondences, are specifically intended to assist individuals navigating the PAAB preclearance system. Repurposing or reproducing this content without written consent from the PAAB Commissioner is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, use in machine learning or AI models.

Emailing Guidelines to HCPs

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Miscellaneous
2 Posts 2 Posters 865 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G Offline
    G Offline
    georgian21
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    56c764a1-aaf0-447f-9c94-ddeb0e19419a-image.png Is the following Rep email considered as PAAB exempt? The email contains no brand logo, has an open field for the Rep salutation and 1 line of copy: “Here is the link to the complete Guidelines that we discussed today”.

    Here are 4 different scenarios:

    1. Guidelines are Canadian and fully aligned with TMA of product. The link in the email points to the first page of the Guidelines.

    2. Guidelines are International, endorsed by a Canadian authoritative source and fully aligned with TMA of product. The link points to the first page of the Guidelines.

    3. What changes if the link points to a specific page within the Guidelines vs. the first page?

    4. What changes if these same Guidelines contain data or information not reflected in the TMA of another product in a different therapeutic category that is promoted by the same Rep (target audience would also be different)?

    Jennifer CarrollJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • G georgian21

      56c764a1-aaf0-447f-9c94-ddeb0e19419a-image.png Is the following Rep email considered as PAAB exempt? The email contains no brand logo, has an open field for the Rep salutation and 1 line of copy: “Here is the link to the complete Guidelines that we discussed today”.

      Here are 4 different scenarios:

      1. Guidelines are Canadian and fully aligned with TMA of product. The link in the email points to the first page of the Guidelines.

      2. Guidelines are International, endorsed by a Canadian authoritative source and fully aligned with TMA of product. The link points to the first page of the Guidelines.

      3. What changes if the link points to a specific page within the Guidelines vs. the first page?

      4. What changes if these same Guidelines contain data or information not reflected in the TMA of another product in a different therapeutic category that is promoted by the same Rep (target audience would also be different)?

      Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
      Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
      Jennifer Carroll
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Good Morning @georgian21

      Rep emails are considered PAAB exempt when they are true one-to-one communications. If this is not truly a one-to-one communication (pre-prepared, sent to many etc.) it would not be considered exempt. (See Dissemination” in the document Clarification regarding digitization of APS: Helping healthcare product manufacturers plan for the evolving COVID-19 operational context)
      To address the various scenarios:

      1. This would be acceptable
      2. This would likely be acceptable upon confirmation from the Canadian medical body in the respective field (What constitutes current medical opinion)
      3. An assessment of the link and linked content would be made during the review process
      4. Link to specific sections would not be acceptable. Linking to the homepage of authoritative consensus guidelines may be considered
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • Users
      • Groups