Forum Update: Supporting Community-Led Discussion
The forum was created as a space for shared learning and peer support, and as the community grows, we want to lean more fully into that purpose.
Going forward, PAAB will be taking a more listening-first role in forum discussions. Rather than responding immediately to every question, we’ll be encouraging members to engage with one another, share experiences, and help build collective understanding. PAAB will continue to monitor conversations and will step in to:
- Correct any misunderstandings
- Provide guidance when questions remain unanswered after a few days
- Support discussions where official clarification is needed
Our goal is to foster a collaborative, trusted community where knowledge is shared and strengthened by everyone’s contributions.
Thank you for being part of the conversation.
Digital Housing
-
We're building a Digital Resource Library microsite that will provide physicians with a secure, reliable way to access PAAB approved information/tools about a specific condition.
Wondering what happens each time we add/remove/renew a piece - Do we need to re-submit the entire site for review each time? Any recommendations on how best to manage tools ongoing once the site up and running?
-
We're building a Digital Resource Library microsite that will provide physicians with a secure, reliable way to access PAAB approved information/tools about a specific condition.
Wondering what happens each time we add/remove/renew a piece - Do we need to re-submit the entire site for review each time? Any recommendations on how best to manage tools ongoing once the site up and running?
Hey @SB
A library of tools could be designed and set up with an appropriate algorithm/framework for the addition of PAAB approved tools in the appropriate locations (considerations for linkages, clear definition of audiences etc.). The initial review would help to outline and structure this. The addition of new tools as downloadable resources could be considered without a new review, if they were restricted to a document title which was claim neutral. As part of the tools submission, PAAB should be notified that it will be added to the library, and where in the library it will be placed. Anything that extends beyond the naming convention for the tool (i.e. thumbnail images, descriptions, search terms etc.) would prompt a new review. PAAB can provide an opinion review on the structure once you have a firm outline.
-
Hey @SB
A library of tools could be designed and set up with an appropriate algorithm/framework for the addition of PAAB approved tools in the appropriate locations (considerations for linkages, clear definition of audiences etc.). The initial review would help to outline and structure this. The addition of new tools as downloadable resources could be considered without a new review, if they were restricted to a document title which was claim neutral. As part of the tools submission, PAAB should be notified that it will be added to the library, and where in the library it will be placed. Anything that extends beyond the naming convention for the tool (i.e. thumbnail images, descriptions, search terms etc.) would prompt a new review. PAAB can provide an opinion review on the structure once you have a firm outline.
@jennifer-carroll Thanks - Appreciate the reply!
