Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Forum

  1. Home
  2. PAAB Q&A
  3. Miscellaneous
  4. Medical Information
PAAB Notice
The responses, guidance, and advisories provided by the Pharmaceutical Advertising Advisory Board (PAAB), including but not limited to those available through the PAAB Forum, the PAAB website, and any PAAB correspondences, are specifically intended to assist individuals navigating the PAAB preclearance system. Repurposing or reproducing this content without written consent from the PAAB Commissioner is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, use in machine learning or AI models.

Medical Information

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Miscellaneous
6 Posts 3 Posters 921 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Offline
    J Offline
    JustineEve
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi there,

    I had a question in regards to Medical Information websites. Medical information falls under the unsolicited request for information in the code, however is there a way of notifying HCPs of a medical information website so that they have the correct contact information for the medical information department? For example, would field staff be allowed to be able to leave behind something that displays the medical information website URL? What would the regulation around this be?

    Jennifer CarrollJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J JustineEve

      Hi there,

      I had a question in regards to Medical Information websites. Medical information falls under the unsolicited request for information in the code, however is there a way of notifying HCPs of a medical information website so that they have the correct contact information for the medical information department? For example, would field staff be allowed to be able to leave behind something that displays the medical information website URL? What would the regulation around this be?

      Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
      Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
      Jennifer Carroll
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Hello @justineeve

      It is possible to have a medical information website and to have the link or access to this site distributed by sales reps. If the message is promoting a service by the company and is being distributed by the sales rep, it should be reviewed by PAAB under Code section 7.4. During this review, we will look to ensure that there is no content or messages that could jeopardize the intent and execution of the medical information website remaining “non-advertising” per the Health Canada document, Distinction Between Advertising and Other Activities document. For example, a post card that encouraged HCPs to reach out to medical information for off-label information, would not be acceptable. Q&A 176 may also be a relevance.

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Jennifer CarrollJ Jennifer Carroll

        Hello @justineeve

        It is possible to have a medical information website and to have the link or access to this site distributed by sales reps. If the message is promoting a service by the company and is being distributed by the sales rep, it should be reviewed by PAAB under Code section 7.4. During this review, we will look to ensure that there is no content or messages that could jeopardize the intent and execution of the medical information website remaining “non-advertising” per the Health Canada document, Distinction Between Advertising and Other Activities document. For example, a post card that encouraged HCPs to reach out to medical information for off-label information, would not be acceptable. Q&A 176 may also be a relevance.

        J Offline
        J Offline
        JustineEve
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @jennifer-carroll Hi Jennifer, thank you for the prompt reply! Would this also apply to MSLs in the field? Would the piece still need to go through PAAB review if it just stated "X Medical Information" and then the URL?

        Jennifer CarrollJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J JustineEve

          @jennifer-carroll Hi Jennifer, thank you for the prompt reply! Would this also apply to MSLs in the field? Would the piece still need to go through PAAB review if it just stated "X Medical Information" and then the URL?

          Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
          Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
          Jennifer Carroll
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Hello @justineeve

          Health Canada does not distinguish between titles applied to the employee. The role that they play and the actions taken are what should be considered. If the MSL is distributing service awareness tools/pieces proactively, they would likely fall under the scope of advertising and should be reviewed. However, if the piece is limited to the particular text in the question, and X=company name, there should be nothing to review regardless of whether it is distributed by a drug rep or MSL. The content in that particular execution would be exempt.

          If the piece would provide information about the service, particularly with regards to access to information relating to drug therapy, the piece would likely require review. If you are unsure for any particular piece, feel free to submit an opinion for our assessment (PAAB Policy and Procedure for Exemption Requests).

          J 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Jennifer CarrollJ Jennifer Carroll

            Hello @justineeve

            Health Canada does not distinguish between titles applied to the employee. The role that they play and the actions taken are what should be considered. If the MSL is distributing service awareness tools/pieces proactively, they would likely fall under the scope of advertising and should be reviewed. However, if the piece is limited to the particular text in the question, and X=company name, there should be nothing to review regardless of whether it is distributed by a drug rep or MSL. The content in that particular execution would be exempt.

            If the piece would provide information about the service, particularly with regards to access to information relating to drug therapy, the piece would likely require review. If you are unsure for any particular piece, feel free to submit an opinion for our assessment (PAAB Policy and Procedure for Exemption Requests).

            J Offline
            J Offline
            JustineEve
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            @jennifer-carroll Thank you! Are you able to point me to the location within the code that highlights this exemption?

            Jennifer CarrollJ 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J JustineEve

              @jennifer-carroll Thank you! Are you able to point me to the location within the code that highlights this exemption?

              Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
              Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
              Jennifer Carroll
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Hey @justineeve

              Please see code section 1.5E.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Users
              • Groups