Navigation

    Forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    Regarding the use of PROs in promotional materials:

    Claims & Support/References for Claims
    2
    2
    31
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • G
      GeoffLS20 last edited by

      In cases where a PRO is not contained in the TMA and is not the primary endpoint (but is a reliable and valid pre-defined endpoint and is consistent with the primary endpoint), does the PRO need to be designated as a key secondary outcome in order to be included in promotional materials? Additionally, generally speaking, under what circumstances would the disclosure of other failed secondary endpoints be required?

      Jennifer Carroll 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • Jennifer Carroll
        Jennifer Carroll @GeoffLS20 last edited by

        Hello @geoffls20

        The document Guidance on Patient Reported Outcomes provides the limitations for use of PROs. It is not required that the study identifies it as a “key” secondary endpoint. Note that it must be identified as a “secondary endpoint” and this must be disclosed in the APS per code section 3.1.10.

        The discloser of failed secondary endpoints is required when they are closely related to the other endpoints so as not to be selective. (s.5.12)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • First post
          Last post