Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Forum

  1. Home
  2. PAAB Q&A
  3. Disclosure requirements: PI & Safety Information, Federal schedule, study parameters, reference lists
  4. 243 - If a product has multiple indications, but we are developing a promotional piece for just one of those indications, does the fair balance copy still have to contain all indications and balance copy for ALL the indications? Thank you.
PAAB Notice
The responses, guidance, and advisories provided by the Pharmaceutical Advertising Advisory Board (PAAB), including but not limited to those available through the PAAB Forum, the PAAB website, and any PAAB correspondences, are specifically intended to assist individuals navigating the PAAB preclearance system. Repurposing or reproducing this content without written consent from the PAAB Commissioner is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, use in machine learning or AI models.

243 - If a product has multiple indications, but we are developing a promotional piece for just one of those indications, does the fair balance copy still have to contain all indications and balance copy for ALL the indications? Thank you.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Disclosure requirements: PI & Safety Information, Federal schedule, study parameters, reference lists
3 Posts 2 Posters 619 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
    Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
    Jennifer Carroll
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    No. The piece need only contain the indications relating to the promoted uses. Note that some claims promote all indications (thus requiring presentation of all indications). An example that comes to mind is "Product X has 3 indications" (i.e. the 3 indication would appear in proximity to the claim). If the claims truly relate only to the one indication per your question, that is the only indication which is required to be presented.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Jennifer CarrollJ Jennifer Carroll

      No. The piece need only contain the indications relating to the promoted uses. Note that some claims promote all indications (thus requiring presentation of all indications). An example that comes to mind is "Product X has 3 indications" (i.e. the 3 indication would appear in proximity to the claim). If the claims truly relate only to the one indication per your question, that is the only indication which is required to be presented.

      M Offline
      M Offline
      matt.s17
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      @jennifer-carroll Hi Jennifer. Just a quick clarification on this response. If a product has multiple indications, but a warning & precaution is only specific to one of those indications, does that warning & precaution need to be incorporated to the fair balance of ALL indications or just when that particular indication is mentioned/promoted? Many thanks!

      Jennifer CarrollJ 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M matt.s17

        @jennifer-carroll Hi Jennifer. Just a quick clarification on this response. If a product has multiple indications, but a warning & precaution is only specific to one of those indications, does that warning & precaution need to be incorporated to the fair balance of ALL indications or just when that particular indication is mentioned/promoted? Many thanks!

        Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
        Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
        Jennifer Carroll
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Hey @matt-s17

        If the warning and precaution is clearly limited to one indication which is not presented in the piece, then no, it would not be required in a piece which did not have mention of that indication.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups