Forum Update: Supporting Community-Led Discussion
The forum was created as a space for shared learning and peer support, and as the community grows, we want to lean more fully into that purpose.
Going forward, PAAB will be taking a more listening-first role in forum discussions. Rather than responding immediately to every question, we’ll be encouraging members to engage with one another, share experiences, and help build collective understanding. PAAB will continue to monitor conversations and will step in to:
- Correct any misunderstandings
- Provide guidance when questions remain unanswered after a few days
- Support discussions where official clarification is needed
Our goal is to foster a collaborative, trusted community where knowledge is shared and strengthened by everyone’s contributions.
Thank you for being part of the conversation.
General submissions questions
-
Hello!
We are looking at optimizing some internal creation processes, and were wondering what (if any) APS types would not require a copy deck to be submitted? As in, would the layout be sufficient in any of the cases? Could you please also point me to the PAAB code section where I could find this?
Thanks in advance!
Paul -
Hello!
We are looking at optimizing some internal creation processes, and were wondering what (if any) APS types would not require a copy deck to be submitted? As in, would the layout be sufficient in any of the cases? Could you please also point me to the PAAB code section where I could find this?
Thanks in advance!
PaulHi @costeap
Please see our submission guidance document, under section 2.1.3, which gives direction on copydeck and layout submissions.
-
Hi @costeap
Please see our submission guidance document, under section 2.1.3, which gives direction on copydeck and layout submissions.
@jennifer-carroll Short and sweet, thanks Jennifer!
