Unauthorized Use of Content on this Site: The responses, guidance, and advisories provided by the Pharmaceutical Advertising Advisory Board (PAAB)—including, but not limited to, those available through the PAAB Forum, the PAAB website, and any PAAB correspondence—are specifically intended to assist individuals navigating the PAAB preclearance system. Repurposing or reproducing this content, or using it for model training or any related purposes, is strictly prohibited without the express prior written consent of PAAB. This includes, but is not limited to, the use of such materials in automated systems, machine learning models, or artificial intelligence applications.
696 - We have a study we would like to use to support a claim in a new tool. In this study “DRUG B” is used as an add-on to our product, whereas in our product monograph our indication is stated as an add-on to “DRUG B”. Would this be an issue?
-
The first step in assessing the acceptability of the study is to determine if it is consistent with the TMA. We would consider consistency with the indication/patient population studied, dosing, etc. As the indication specifies that the product is an add-on to drug B and it is not used in that fashion in the study, the study design does not appear to be consistent with the TMA. As this appears to be a specific question about a specific product and study, we suggest submitting the published study in an opinion file where we can assess the study design and consistency with TMA.
