Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Forum

  1. Home
  2. PAAB Q&A
  3. DTCA/I, consumer secondary audience
  4. 526 - On an unbranded, consumer-facing, disease state website, it is permissible to discuss differential diagnosis? As in, could you "compare" the symptoms of the website condition with another, similar condition with overlapping symptoms?
The responses, guidance, and advisories provided by the Pharmaceutical Advertising Advisory Board (PAAB), including but not limited to those available through the PAAB Forum, the PAAB website, and any PAAB correspondences, are specifically intended to assist individuals navigating the PAAB preclearance system. Repurposing or reproducing this content without written consent from the PAAB Commissioner is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, use in machine learning or AI models.

526 - On an unbranded, consumer-facing, disease state website, it is permissible to discuss differential diagnosis? As in, could you "compare" the symptoms of the website condition with another, similar condition with overlapping symptoms?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved DTCA/I, consumer secondary audience
1 Posts 1 Posters 292 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Jennifer CarrollJ Online
    Jennifer CarrollJ Online
    Jennifer Carroll
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I’ll presume you are referring to a help-seeking message or consumer brochure meeting all applicable requirements of the Health Canada policy document “The Distinction Between Advertising and Other Activities”. In that case, the answer is yes provided that the way you’ve executed the differential diagnosis does not render the piece to be advertising (e.g. does not favour or add emphasis to the sponsor’s product in a consumer brochure)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    • Login or register to search.
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups