The responses, guidance, and advisories provided by the Pharmaceutical Advertising Advisory Board (PAAB),
including but not limited to those available through the PAAB Forum, the PAAB website, and any PAAB
correspondences, are specifically intended to assist individuals navigating the PAAB preclearance system.
Repurposing or reproducing this content without written consent from the PAAB Commissioner is strictly
prohibited. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, use in machine learning or AI models.
676 - Hi Patrick - Would you be able to explain the rationale behind Code s3.7, and why combination products cannot reference the brand names of their individual components (only the generic names)?
Miscellaneous
1
Posts
1
Posters
340
Views
1
Watching
-
Hello. The rationale for section 3.7 is that different formulations could cause products to have different properties. One should not assume that two product having different non-medicinal ingredients have identical properties. For example, they may have different pharmacokinetic and / or clinical properties. Your second question is related to section 3.7 but also touches on other issues in critical appraisal. A clinical trial is an instrument designed to evaluate a hypothesis relating to that particular / precise independent variable. Just as you would not generate claims that extrapolate beyond the studied population, you should not generate claims that extrapolate beyond that independent variable.
