Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Forum

U

Username

@Username
Agency

Forum Update: Supporting Community-Led Discussion

The forum was created as a space for shared learning and peer support, and as the community grows, we want to lean more fully into that purpose.

Going forward, PAAB will be taking a more listening-first role in forum discussions. Rather than responding immediately to every question, we’ll be encouraging members to engage with one another, share experiences, and help build collective understanding. PAAB will continue to monitor conversations and will step in to:

  • Correct any misunderstandings
  • Provide guidance when questions remain unanswered after a few days
  • Support discussions where official clarification is needed

Our goal is to foster a collaborative, trusted community where knowledge is shared and strengthened by everyone’s contributions.

Thank you for being part of the conversation.

About
Posts
36
Topics
29
Shares
0
Groups
2
Followers
1
Following
1

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • What constitutes "endorsement"?
    U Username

    Hi, I am working in a therapeutic area that currently has no Canadian guidelines. A relevant standard-setting organization, on their website, acknowledges that there are no Canadian guidelines and directs HCPs to the US guidelines. Could this constitute adequate endorsement? Thanks!

    Miscellaneous

  • PAAB changes to application/requirements for pieces
    U Username

    Hello,
    I recently submitted a piece with an approved claim of "X years in Canada across indications," and found out that PAAB is now requesting that the year of each indication's NOC be added to the claim. Would it be possible for PAAB to provide an explanation of why this change happened, why the code was previously considered in accordance with the code, and also would it be possible for PAAB to provide notices when general changes on how PAAB decides to interpret and apply the code are made? It is difficult for us to explain to clients on why PAAB suddenly feels that the content violates the code, as no explanation is provided on the change.

    A similar example is that directing HCPs to pre-gate websites now requiring a disclaimer, no notice was given to agencies prior to receiving response letters requiring this disclaimer. These changes in how the code is interpreted and applied creates a lack transparency.

    PAAB Q&A
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups