Navigation

    Forum

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    Virtual Conference Booth - logo only with link to PM exempt?

    PAAB Code
    2
    4
    253
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      KEOCA last edited by

      For a virtual conference booth, if the booth only consisted of a panel with the brand logo, linking to the Health Canada approved PM, would this require submission to PAAB or is it exempt? We have been seeing other companies use this approach.

      Jennifer Carroll 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • Jennifer Carroll
        Jennifer Carroll @KEOCA last edited by

        Good Morning @keoca

        A conference booth restricted to the logo and a link to the Health Canada approved PM may be considered exempt if the logo does not imply therapeutic use or a feature of the product. Note that if the booth has links, attachments, banners or copy throughout the conference which direct participants to the booth, chat functionality or any other interactive or promotional elements, it may not fall under the exempt conditions. If you are unsure, you can submit for a ‘PAAB exempt’ opinion (Policy and Procedure for Reviewing Exemption Request eFiles).

        K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • K
          KEOCA @Jennifer Carroll last edited by

          @jennifer-carroll Does the exempt status change if the virtual booth as described has one other feature, a "details button" where visitors can learn about the booth owner (i.e. a corporate message with no product mention)?

          Jennifer Carroll 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Jennifer Carroll
            Jennifer Carroll @KEOCA last edited by

            Good morning @keoca

            The inclusion of the brand logo and PM, as well as a corporate message, is likely subject to review (would not meet exemption per code section 1.5E).

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • First post
              Last post