Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Forum

  1. Home
  2. PAAB Q&A
  3. Miscellaneous
  4. Formulary messaging clarification
The responses, guidance, and advisories provided by the Pharmaceutical Advertising Advisory Board (PAAB), including but not limited to those available through the PAAB Forum, the PAAB website, and any PAAB correspondences, are specifically intended to assist individuals navigating the PAAB preclearance system. Repurposing or reproducing this content without written consent from the PAAB Commissioner is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, use in machine learning or AI models.

Formulary messaging clarification

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Miscellaneous
3 Posts 2 Posters 39 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    adelaidebaker
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Hi there,

    I’m seeking clarification on the rules around formulary messaging. Specifically:

    1. I understand that therapeutic claims must be separate from formulary information, but can both appear within the same piece as long as they are clearly distinct?

    2. Are formulary claims permitted to be combined with non-therapeutic messages (ex: experience claims)?

    3. Finally, can formulary messaging be directed to patients to inform them of coverage in their province? I understand that this is acceptable in a DTC context, but I’d like to confirm whether this is also permitted in patient-directed materials (ex: “Now covered on ODB”).

    Thank you for your guidance.

    Adelaide

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
      Jennifer CarrollJ Offline
      Jennifer Carroll
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Hey @adelaidebaker

      1. Yes.
      2. Experience claims should not be positioned in a manner which suggests significance to the listing or vise versa. It cannot be stated or inferred that the experience is linked to coverage or that coverage is due to the experience.
      3. Patient information should be informational and not promotional. The copy “Now covered on ODB” would be considered promotional. For acceptable communications around formulary coverage, see Guidance on branded patient information section 1.3 Formulary Statements.
      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Offline
        A Offline
        adelaidebaker
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Thank you!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups