Forum Update: Supporting Community-Led Discussion
The forum was created as a space for shared learning and peer support, and as the community grows, we want to lean more fully into that purpose.
Going forward, PAAB will be taking a more listening-first role in forum discussions. Rather than responding immediately to every question, we’ll be encouraging members to engage with one another, share experiences, and help build collective understanding. PAAB will continue to monitor conversations and will step in to:
- Correct any misunderstandings
- Provide guidance when questions remain unanswered after a few days
- Support discussions where official clarification is needed
Our goal is to foster a collaborative, trusted community where knowledge is shared and strengthened by everyone’s contributions.
Thank you for being part of the conversation.
326 - Can we create a comparative timeline of 2 products (1 ours and 1 a competitor) from the same therapeutic category and who have some of the same indications? The timelines would only show indications, which ones each product has and when they were received. Thank you.
-
Comparisons of product properties are permissible as per Code section 5.10.2iii. The comparison should be complete, with no information relevant to the comparison omitted (e.g. the indications must each be complete). The comparison must not appear in the context of messaging implying clinical significance. A disclaimer is required as outlined in the above noted Code section. With regards to the dates, keep in mind that there should be no direct or indirect reference to the approval process ad per c.01.007 of the Food and Drugs regulations.
