Forum

Hi,

Are there any updates on the Creative Imagery guidance? As we are ramping up our efforts to integrate GenAI in our creative exercises, a guidance PDF would come in handy.

Thanks in advance!
Paul

@danthony Such great news, Danielle! Thanks for sharing! Is there a firm go-live? I'd rather only propagate this internally when there is one

Have a great weekend!

@jennifer-carroll Short and sweet, thanks Jennifer!

Hello!

We are looking at optimizing some internal creation processes, and were wondering what (if any) APS types would not require a copy deck to be submitted? As in, would the layout be sufficient in any of the cases? Could you please also point me to the PAAB code section where I could find this?

Thanks in advance!
Paul

@jennifer-carroll Thank you so much! This should help us learn

@jennifer-carroll Yay! Thanks for this!
One remaining question from the previous report: can there be some guidance on why tags were deemed invalid? We were almost looking forward to that following the previous exchange (https://forum.paab.ca/topic/3159/paab-efiles-tag-and-cei-report-q2-2023/4?_=1701119019940)

or maybe communicate directly to the tag submitter(s)?

@jennifer-carroll Thanks for the reports, much appreciated! We were wondering if it would be possible for future reports to include some information about the dismissed tags? (e.g. what criteria they went against, what guideline they ignored etc) That way we could learn from our mistakes and potentially improve collaboration in the future

@jennifer-carroll According to the tag report, there were not submissions for Q1?