Hi,
Are there any updates on the Creative Imagery guidance? As we are ramping up our efforts to integrate GenAI in our creative exercises, a guidance PDF would come in handy.
Thanks in advance!
Paul
C
costeap
@costeap
Forum Update: Supporting Community-Led Discussion
The forum was created as a space for shared learning and peer support, and as the community grows, we want to lean more fully into that purpose.
Going forward, PAAB will be taking a more listening-first role in forum discussions. Rather than responding immediately to every question, we’ll be encouraging members to engage with one another, share experiences, and help build collective understanding. PAAB will continue to monitor conversations and will step in to:
- Correct any misunderstandings
- Provide guidance when questions remain unanswered after a few days
- Support discussions where official clarification is needed
Our goal is to foster a collaborative, trusted community where knowledge is shared and strengthened by everyone’s contributions.
Thank you for being part of the conversation.
Posts
-
Initiative Updates -
Coming Soon! PAAB’s Messenger Service for ARO submissions@danthony Such great news, Danielle! Thanks for sharing! Is there a firm go-live? I'd rather only propagate this internally when there is one
Have a great weekend!
-
General submissions questions@jennifer-carroll Short and sweet, thanks Jennifer!
-
General submissions questionsHello!
We are looking at optimizing some internal creation processes, and were wondering what (if any) APS types would not require a copy deck to be submitted? As in, would the layout be sufficient in any of the cases? Could you please also point me to the PAAB code section where I could find this?
Thanks in advance!
Paul -
Posted: CEI and Tag Report, Pre-NOC changes, Duration Document update and Quarterly Review@jennifer-carroll Thank you so much! This should help us learn
-
Posted: CEI and Tag Report, Pre-NOC changes, Duration Document update and Quarterly Review@jennifer-carroll Yay! Thanks for this!
One remaining question from the previous report: can there be some guidance on why tags were deemed invalid? We were almost looking forward to that following the previous exchange (https://forum.paab.ca/topic/3159/paab-efiles-tag-and-cei-report-q2-2023/4?_=1701119019940) -
PAAB eFiles Tag and CEI Report Q2 - 2023or maybe communicate directly to the tag submitter(s)?
-
PAAB eFiles Tag and CEI Report Q2 - 2023@jennifer-carroll Thanks for the reports, much appreciated! We were wondering if it would be possible for future reports to include some information about the dismissed tags? (e.g. what criteria they went against, what guideline they ignored etc) That way we could learn from our mistakes and potentially improve collaboration in the future
-
PAAB eFiles Tag and CEI Report 2023@jennifer-carroll According to the tag report, there were not submissions for Q1?
