Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Forum

L

Laurelea

@Laurelea
Agency

Forum Update: Supporting Community-Led Discussion

The forum was created as a space for shared learning and peer support, and as the community grows, we want to lean more fully into that purpose.

Going forward, PAAB will be taking a more listening-first role in forum discussions. Rather than responding immediately to every question, we’ll be encouraging members to engage with one another, share experiences, and help build collective understanding. PAAB will continue to monitor conversations and will step in to:

  • Correct any misunderstandings
  • Provide guidance when questions remain unanswered after a few days
  • Support discussions where official clarification is needed

Our goal is to foster a collaborative, trusted community where knowledge is shared and strengthened by everyone’s contributions.

Thank you for being part of the conversation.

About
Posts
2
Topics
2
Shares
0
Groups
1
Followers
1
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Attachment of clinical reprints in an RTE
    L Laurelea

    Re: Rep triggered e-mails
    As a follow on question, in the the same context as described previously (no branding or drug mention in the e-mail itself, what would be the naming convention for clinical reprints attached to an RTE? For clinical reprints for which we have already obtained PAAB approval to distribute for a brand, would it suffice to have the author name, journal and year e.g., "Smith, NEJM 2015" with no fair balance needed? Could the acronym of the study name be included e.g., "Smith, NEJM 2015 PRTII study", and still require no fair balance?
    Thanks again

    Electronic Media

  • Rep triggered e-mails
    L Laurelea

    Re: edirect campaign to HCP
    I read in a previous post that reps that promote more than one brand to the same HCP may include attachments for more than one brand to their RTE.

    If the subject line, body of the e-mail and sign-off do not contain any brand name or branding whatsoever, is it necessary to include any fair balance at all? The only place a brand name would appear would be in the file name, E,g, brandxpatient supporttool.pdf. We would assume not, because there are no claims, and each tool would have the fair balance appropriate to that tool, but would appreciate confirmation.
    (We are aware that branded and unbranded tools cannot be included in the same RTE).
    Thanks, L.

    Electronic Media
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups