Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

Forum

  1. Home
  2. PAAB Q&A
  3. Claims & Support/References for Claims

Claims & Support/References for Claims

250 Topics 423 Posts
The responses, guidance, and advisories provided by the Pharmaceutical Advertising Advisory Board (PAAB), including but not limited to those available through the PAAB Forum, the PAAB website, and any PAAB correspondences, are specifically intended to assist individuals navigating the PAAB preclearance system. Repurposing or reproducing this content without written consent from the PAAB Commissioner is strictly prohibited. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, use in machine learning or AI models.

  • All tags
  • Recently Replied
  • Recently Created
  • Most Posts
  • Most Votes
  • Most Views
Load new posts
Log in to post
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    575 - Our question is related to question no 70 which was: "The PAAB codes allows side by side comparison of non-clinical data from 2 or monographs. Would it be acceptable to use a comparative table of non-clinical data (ie. pharmacokinetics) from a review article? Extract from 5.10.2: [Information from two or more Product Monographs on products' properties7 and on instructions for use or use limitations8 may be acceptable as side-by-side presentations and in text form.]". PAAB answer: "The PAAB Code (s3.1.1) does not regard "review articles" as high level evidence to support a drug specific claim because they reflect an opinion/ summary from an author rather than actual findings of a primary study. This also applies to non-clinical claims. Our question: Does PAAB regard "Guidelines" (such as CGA guidelines) as high and appropriate level of evidence for a side-by-side comparison of use limitations? Thanks

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    501 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    572 - As part of our initial approval for a drug, we currently have an indication for the treatment of condition X. An additional trial has been published for cancer patients with condition X. The dosing remains consistent with the initial TMA. Can we promote our drug for cancer patients with condition X?

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    354 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    570 - Hi, We would like to highlight specific market data for our brand. We seem to fall into the guidelines that PAAB has put together but the specific data we would like to highlight is the new patient share (this consists of naive and switch patients). It would be a "leader" or "#1" claim. This data is from the private payer database (RxDynamics). Is this type of data allowable? I've done leader market claims as it relates to the total prescriptions dispensed but have never tried this type of data. Thank you.

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    513 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    567 - We would like to know if we can make a claim about the % of patients who would recommend a specific treatment to other patients. The % is published in a retrospective study done on patients who were taking this specific therapy. It is a patient reported outcome that is not in the Product Monograph. Please advise if there is any way to put such a claim through.

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    661 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    564 - Based on advisory board recommendations for supportive tools, a company would like to create an unbranded "reference tool" which documents the metabolic pathways for drugs in a particular therapeutic area. This would be a service item distributed by the representatives. Information would be taken primarily from Product monographs and in a few cases, the literature. Is there any reason this would not be allowed? what would be the constraints?

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    472 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    562 - Can we develop a sales aid where the user can select specific topics (efficacy, safety, cost) and then present these to a physician? The concept is to create a custom presentation based on the needs of the physician. So if a physician only wants to hear about efficacy and cost, those would be the only sections to appear. This would be like adding tabs to a print sales aid but since digital, we can create the sections that will appear based on the customers need

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    318 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    560 - As follow-up to Questions 291/328/500, would medical device (class II)-sponsored advertising be subject to PAAB review, if comparisons were made between the medical device and a non-medical (drug-containing) device?

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    447 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    553 - Can you use "New" in APS for a product that has been on the market but has had their indication revised/expanded?

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    419 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    551 - We have a patient survey conducted by a patient association looking at reasons for stopping therapy. Can we use this information in an unbranded APS to highlight the most common reasons for stopping therapy?

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    848 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    548 - 1. Can a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis be used in promotional materials? mITT analysis excluded patients who discontinued due to adverse event, lost to follow-up, or subject withdrawal. 2. If yes, would also need to show the primary endpoint analysis, ITT, as shown in the PM? 3. Are there any specific requirements on how the primary ITT and mITT analyses need to be displayed?

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    443 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    547 - What type of reference is needed to claim absence of a specific excipient in a product? Would the fact that the specific excipient is not mentioned in the product monograph be enough to support this type of claim, or would some sort of certification of absence be required? For example, gluten free certification?

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    452 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    541 - Can you please advise if CADTH Common Drug Review publications can be used as evidence for efficacy, pharmacoeconomic or recommendation claims?

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    525 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    531 - Re: Q#522 for use of Summary Basis Decision in advertising and you replied: "Yes. Provided the content referenced from it is not inconsistent with the product monograph", if data from the SBD does not appear in the PM, can we use it? It would not be 'inconsistent'. If PAAB considers the SBD the same weight as the PM, then it should be acceptable. Is this an accurate assessment?

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    364 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    529 - Hi, I have a question about 3.1 specifically the section regarding claims consistent with the limitations of the Health Canada Terms of Marketing Authorization. There are some on our team that believe this means we are not able to use data that is not within the PM regardless. There are others that believe if a claim is based on a similar study population, endpoint and outcomes are consistent with the monograph, it appropriate. We seem to go back and forth on this a great deal and I like to hear PAABs thoughts. Thanks

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    633 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    523 - Hello, I would like clarification on how efficacy data and mechanism of action data can be presented together in a promotional piece. My understanding is the MOA is considered non-clinical and therefore must be physically separate from efficacy or clinical claims. Is this assumption correct? I am not sure why this would be. Can you please explain why I cannot mention how a product works and how well it works together in a page? Thank you,

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    645 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    522 - Can the "Summary Basis of Decision" from Health Canada be used for advertising claims?

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    362 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    This topic is deleted!

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    13 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    516 - I am wondering if we are able to create stickers for our material to indicate that we have formulary however I would like to keep it simple and say something like "Now on formulary (special authorization) in your province" or "...in this province" without specifying the province itself. We would of course only place these stickers on tools where the province has received formulary and we would of course provide PAAB with an FYI as to what tools and where we would be placing the stickers. Is this doable?

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    863 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    512 - Can you please clarify why product MOA can only come from the TMA, and not published, peer-reviewed in vitro studies? MOA is frequently characterized post-NOC, particularly for products where ‘the exact mechanism of action is unknown’.

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    607 Views
    No one has replied
  • Jennifer CarrollJ

    508 - If exacerbation rates are provided in a publication with other details with which NNTs can be calculated, would PAAB allow us to promote the NNTs?

    Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    423 Views
    No one has replied
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups