Claims & Support/References for Claims
238
Topics
390
Posts
The responses, guidance, and advisories provided by the Pharmaceutical Advertising Advisory Board (PAAB),
including but not limited to those available through the PAAB Forum, the PAAB website, and any PAAB
correspondences, are specifically intended to assist individuals navigating the PAAB preclearance system.
Repurposing or reproducing this content without written consent from the PAAB Commissioner is strictly
prohibited. This prohibition includes, but is not limited to, use in machine learning or AI models.
-
-
590 - Hello, We plan to create a survey to gather statistics on lifestyle habits and general knowledge of the respondents on a virus in order to use the said metrics in a promotional tool, in the vaccination field. 1000 respondents is the usual number needed to produce relevant or serious statistics. The question is: As per PAAB's guidelines, is there a minimum number of respondents needed in a survey to be able to use the statistics produced by it in promotional tools. Thank you
-
585 - Hello - I understand that data exceeding the duration of the TMA is not acceptable (eg. TMA study A is 1 year in duration, new study B is 2 years in duration). However in a situation where a registration trial is designed to read out to 3 years, and the TMA only contains year 2 data, is it acceptable to include year 3 data in APS? Would this be dependent on the year 3 data being directionally consistent with the year 2 data?
-
-
582 - Can NBRx data be used to make market share claims, if the same principles governing TRx data were applied? Example: Arbace is the #1 dispensed hypertensive among new patients. If so, would the NBRx data need to be directionally consistent with the TRx data (ie. if Arbace is in fact not the #1 dispensed among ALL patients)?
-
-
-
575 - Our question is related to question no 70 which was: "The PAAB codes allows side by side comparison of non-clinical data from 2 or monographs. Would it be acceptable to use a comparative table of non-clinical data (ie. pharmacokinetics) from a review article? Extract from 5.10.2: [Information from two or more Product Monographs on products' properties7 and on instructions for use or use limitations8 may be acceptable as side-by-side presentations and in text form.]". PAAB answer: "The PAAB Code (s3.1.1) does not regard "review articles" as high level evidence to support a drug specific claim because they reflect an opinion/ summary from an author rather than actual findings of a primary study. This also applies to non-clinical claims. Our question: Does PAAB regard "Guidelines" (such as CGA guidelines) as high and appropriate level of evidence for a side-by-side comparison of use limitations? Thanks
-
572 - As part of our initial approval for a drug, we currently have an indication for the treatment of condition X. An additional trial has been published for cancer patients with condition X. The dosing remains consistent with the initial TMA. Can we promote our drug for cancer patients with condition X?
-
570 - Hi, We would like to highlight specific market data for our brand. We seem to fall into the guidelines that PAAB has put together but the specific data we would like to highlight is the new patient share (this consists of naive and switch patients). It would be a "leader" or "#1" claim. This data is from the private payer database (RxDynamics). Is this type of data allowable? I've done leader market claims as it relates to the total prescriptions dispensed but have never tried this type of data. Thank you.
-
567 - We would like to know if we can make a claim about the % of patients who would recommend a specific treatment to other patients. The % is published in a retrospective study done on patients who were taking this specific therapy. It is a patient reported outcome that is not in the Product Monograph. Please advise if there is any way to put such a claim through.
-
564 - Based on advisory board recommendations for supportive tools, a company would like to create an unbranded "reference tool" which documents the metabolic pathways for drugs in a particular therapeutic area. This would be a service item distributed by the representatives. Information would be taken primarily from Product monographs and in a few cases, the literature. Is there any reason this would not be allowed? what would be the constraints?
-
562 - Can we develop a sales aid where the user can select specific topics (efficacy, safety, cost) and then present these to a physician? The concept is to create a custom presentation based on the needs of the physician. So if a physician only wants to hear about efficacy and cost, those would be the only sections to appear. This would be like adding tabs to a print sales aid but since digital, we can create the sections that will appear based on the customers need
-
-
-
-
548 - 1. Can a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis be used in promotional materials? mITT analysis excluded patients who discontinued due to adverse event, lost to follow-up, or subject withdrawal. 2. If yes, would also need to show the primary endpoint analysis, ITT, as shown in the PM? 3. Are there any specific requirements on how the primary ITT and mITT analyses need to be displayed?
-
547 - What type of reference is needed to claim absence of a specific excipient in a product? Would the fact that the specific excipient is not mentioned in the product monograph be enough to support this type of claim, or would some sort of certification of absence be required? For example, gluten free certification?
-
-
531 - Re: Q#522 for use of Summary Basis Decision in advertising and you replied: "Yes. Provided the content referenced from it is not inconsistent with the product monograph", if data from the SBD does not appear in the PM, can we use it? It would not be 'inconsistent'. If PAAB considers the SBD the same weight as the PM, then it should be acceptable. Is this an accurate assessment?
